|
Hans de Vries, the driver who refused to pay a
Wilson Parking bill, has won.
This week he received a letter from Wilson
Parking, with a date this time (July 24), declaring
that the bill had been waived and his vehicle was
no longer on the Wilson clamping list.
Mr de Vries started the enquiry that led to the
Wilson-DPI scandal with a letter to the POST last
month.
He said: "My concern is that there could be a
scam going on.
"Since the POST printed my story and phone
number, I have had more than 50 calls from people
with similar experience.
"They were sent undated letters demanding money
for incidents that allegedly occurred months ago.
They were told to pay within seven days or their
vehicle would go on the clamping list.
"Not one of them had received a first
infringement notice."
A Subiaco resident also received a letter from
Wilson Parking waiving an earlier demand for $45
after he had written in protest.
POST enquiries to the Depart-ment of Planning
and Infra-structure stirred interest by 6PR, ABC
Radio 720 and The West Australian.
The DPI at first insisted that it did not
provide Wilson with information, but eventually
admitted that it had handed over 25,500 names and
address of vehicle owners to the company.
An invoice for $70,000 was included, but has
never been paid.
The DPI wants the information back from
Wilson.
A Subiaco driver whose car was clamped by Wilson
said: "This is a nice earner.
"Wilson have only got your car number plate when
you park there. If they want to chase you for
money, they have to get your name and address
somehow.
"The DPI charges local councils $2.50 for each
name and address, but in this case they've given
25,500 names and addresses to Wilson for no fee at
all.
"It's worth a huge amount of money to
Wilson."
Mr de Vries said he had sent a written complaint
to the Department of Consumer and Employment
Protection and was told last week that it had "gone
to a higher authority".
Eric Lumsden, director -general of the DPI, said
last week that an internal investigation was under
way and he would not answer questions.
|